Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?

From: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?
Date: 2007-11-01 20:35:47
Message-ID: 472A38A3.80006@hagander.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-www

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 01, 2007 at 04:30:13PM +0100, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> getting. Sure, SMTP should have latency. But a modern SMTP system
>> shouldn't take hours to deliver an email.
>
> This isn't automatically true, and is explicitly contradicted by the
> relevant RFCs. I think it shouldn't be the _habit_ on such systems,
> but AFAICT it isn't.

AFAICT, it is.
And remember that we're talking about delivery *between two internal
relay machines*. Not delivery to the end user.

//Magnus

In response to

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dave Page 2007-11-01 20:46:46 Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-11-01 20:33:01 Re: what is up with the PG mailing lists?