| From: | andy <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql show dbsize? |
| Date: | 2007-11-01 02:18:55 |
| Message-ID: | 4729378F.80307@squeakycode.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Chris Browne wrote:
> tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) writes:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> Perhaps both these considerations dictate providing another command or a
>>> special flavor of \l instead of just modifying it?
>> I've seen no argument made why \l should print this info at all.
>
> Its interesting information, but I agree that there are BIG
> disadvantages to adding it to \l directly. If there's an "\lv" or
> such, where it's more certain that people want extended information,
> and perhaps that they have appropriate permissions.
Humm... I wonder, instead of putting it in \l, what if we had a \stats
that print stuff just about the db your connected to, and it could
probably find a bunch of other info to print besides just the dbsize.
-Andy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Brendan Jurd | 2007-11-01 03:12:18 | Re: psql show dbsize? |
| Previous Message | Chris Browne | 2007-11-01 01:47:21 | Re: psql show dbsize? |