Re: psql show dbsize?

From: andy <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql show dbsize?
Date: 2007-11-01 02:18:55
Message-ID: 4729378F.80307@squeakycode.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Chris Browne wrote:
> tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) writes:
>> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>>> Perhaps both these considerations dictate providing another command or a
>>> special flavor of \l instead of just modifying it?
>> I've seen no argument made why \l should print this info at all.
>
> Its interesting information, but I agree that there are BIG
> disadvantages to adding it to \l directly. If there's an "\lv" or
> such, where it's more certain that people want extended information,
> and perhaps that they have appropriate permissions.

Humm... I wonder, instead of putting it in \l, what if we had a \stats
that print stuff just about the db your connected to, and it could
probably find a bunch of other info to print besides just the dbsize.

-Andy

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brendan Jurd 2007-11-01 03:12:18 Re: psql show dbsize?
Previous Message Chris Browne 2007-11-01 01:47:21 Re: psql show dbsize?