Re: psql show dbsize?

From: "Brendan Jurd" <direvus(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Chris Browne" <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: psql show dbsize?
Date: 2007-11-01 03:12:18
Message-ID: 37ed240d0710312012x2c472120s3eebba5d431ebf93@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 11/1/07, Chris Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> wrote:
> tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us (Tom Lane) writes:
> > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> >> Perhaps both these considerations dictate providing another command or a
> >> special flavor of \l instead of just modifying it?
> >
> > I've seen no argument made why \l should print this info at all.
>
> Its interesting information, but I agree that there are BIG
> disadvantages to adding it to \l directly. If there's an "\lv" or
> such, where it's more certain that people want extended information,
> and perhaps that they have appropriate permissions.

I'd find this convenient too. Although \l+ would be more consistent
with the \d series of commands.

Cheers
BJ

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-11-01 03:33:46 Re: psql show dbsize?
Previous Message andy 2007-11-01 02:18:55 Re: psql show dbsize?