Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?

From: Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Jacob Champion <jchampion(at)timescale(dot)com>, Postgres hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Mikael Kjellström <mikael(dot)kjellstrom(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Cutting support for OpenSSL 1.0.1 and 1.0.2 in 17~?
Date: 2023-07-03 18:53:52
Message-ID: 4728D0EB-1E90-4CED-A3EF-BBC838ED4C5A@yesql.se
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> On 3 Jul 2023, at 20:40, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 3, 2023 at 4:26 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> I have not gone back to this part yet, though I plan to do so. As we
>> are at the beginning of the development cycle, I have applied the
>> patch to remove support for 1.0.1 for now on HEAD. Let's see what the
>> buildfarm tells.
>
> curculio (OpenBSD 5.9) is failing with "undefined reference to
> `X509_get_signature_nid'", but that's OK, Mikael already supplied a
> modern OpenBSD system to replace it

Thanks for the report! OpenBSD 5.9 was released in 2016 and is thus well over
5 years EOL, so I agree that it doesn't warrant a code change from us to
support this.

--
Daniel Gustafsson

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Thomas Munro 2023-07-03 19:02:35 Re: Size vs size_t or, um, PgSize?
Previous Message Daniel Gustafsson 2023-07-03 18:46:33 Re: Size vs size_t or, um, PgSize?