| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, hlinnaka <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
| Date: | 2015-05-20 17:55:00 |
| Message-ID: | 4724.1432144500@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> writes:
> On 2015-05-20 13:31:57 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> If you can't use an exclusion constraint to support the command,
>> then the error message shouldn't be worded like that.
> But you *can* use a exclusion constraint for DO NOTHING. Just not (yet)
> for DO UPDATE.
Hm. Maybe it would be worth having two different message texts for
the two cases, then?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-05-20 18:24:06 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
| Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-05-20 17:37:06 | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT UPDATE/IGNORE 4.0 |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-05-20 17:59:16 | Re: Disabling trust/ident authentication configure option |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-05-20 17:37:47 | Re: Typo patch |