| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
| Date: | 2007-10-23 17:58:43 |
| Message-ID: | 471E3653.2080005@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>> I know I just love it when a customer breaks something and I ask what
>> changed and it is 56 different things ;)
>>
>> My question is.. with a checkpoint every 2 months, would it make it
>> very easy to release every 6 (or 4 or 3 or 9) months? I am not saying
>> we "have" to but it certainly opens up the possibility to the argument
>> I made.
>
> We could release "alpha" releases. But that assumes that these reviews
> actually result in stuff getting committed even if they're not 100% complete.
That's sounding a lot like mysql.. Next you'll start recommending people
to run that in production.. :-P
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-10-23 18:07:22 | Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit |
| Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2007-10-23 17:55:50 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |