| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
| Date: | 2007-10-23 17:55:50 |
| Message-ID: | 200710231055.50535.josh@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
All,
> We could release "alpha" releases. But that assumes that these reviews
> actually result in stuff getting committed even if they're not 100%
> complete. I think that would be a good thing but I don't think everyone
> else agrees. Also, not all reviewers are committers.
This is what I'm thinking, too. It would be a *lot* easier for the Sun
peformance team (and presumably others) to test performance of stuff which
was getting committed rather than having to hunt down *this* version of
*that* patch and apply it against the snapshot from *this specific date* ...
(puts PR hat on) it would also allow me to keep up a stream of info to the
community and tech press about the new features and optimizations we're
working on, which would mean better coverage for each feature.
--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL @ Sun
San Francisco
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-10-23 17:58:43 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |
| Previous Message | Gregory Stark | 2007-10-23 17:47:39 | Re: Feature Freeze date for 8.4 |