Re: Ready for beta2?

From: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Ready for beta2?
Date: 2007-10-22 14:18:38
Message-ID: 471CB13E.9000306@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
>>> From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
>>> leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does
>>> not support).
>
>> I'm not against stripping the .1252 part, but I don't know what the clean
>> way to do that is, unless we want to drop it for all locales (which may or
>> may not be a good thing).
>
> Why not "if selected encoding is UTF8, drop any .nnn part"?
> (Inside #ifdef WIN32 of course.)

Consistency? It is better than the current situation though I agree.

Regards, Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Trevor Talbot 2007-10-22 14:25:08 Re: 8.2.3: Server crashes on Windows using Eclipse/Junit
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2007-10-22 14:15:38 Re: Ready for beta2?