| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Ready for beta2? |
| Date: | 2007-10-22 14:31:14 |
| Message-ID: | 20071022143114.GL15375@svr2.hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 03:18:38PM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> >> On Mon, Oct 22, 2007 at 08:59:07AM +0100, Dave Page wrote:
> >>> From chatting with Magnus, I believe he'd support losing the .1252 or
> >>> leaving it as is, where I'd rather rewrite it to .65001 (which he does
> >>> not support).
> >
> >> I'm not against stripping the .1252 part, but I don't know what the clean
> >> way to do that is, unless we want to drop it for all locales (which may or
> >> may not be a good thing).
> >
> > Why not "if selected encoding is UTF8, drop any .nnn part"?
> > (Inside #ifdef WIN32 of course.)
>
> Consistency? It is better than the current situation though I agree.
As I chatted with Dave about - wnat encoding? We pull that value cluster
wide, but the encoding is per-database. You could have one UTF8 and one
WIN1252 database...
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2007-10-22 14:31:23 | IN vs EXISTS equivalence |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-10-22 14:30:18 | Re: pgadmin debug on windows |