Re: function defined (or not), more worries on version 10->14 upgrade

On 4/15/22 9:53 AM, Rob Sargent wrote:
> The function in question is working but I'm having trouble getting at
> it's current definition and the possibility that there are more v10->v14
> issues in this database.  The last ERROR: below seems to me "a system
> thing"(tm)
>
>
>
> barnard=# \df genome_threshold_mono
>                                                  List of functions
>  Schema |         Name          | Result data type
> |                  Argument data types                   | Type
> --------+-----------------------+------------------+--------------------------------------------------------+------
>  public | genome_threshold_mono | uuid             | pbs_name text,
> genome_name text                        | func
>  public | genome_threshold_mono | uuid             | pbs_name text,
> genome_name text, conf double precision | func
> (2 rows)
>
> barnard=# \df genome_threshold_mono(pbs_name text, genome_name text,
> conf double precision);
> ERROR:  invalid regular expression: parentheses () not balanced

Don't use the column names just the data types:

\df genome_threshold_mono(text, text, double precision);

> The supplied arguments to the function in question are obviously bogus,
> but the reaction is correct, including call to nested functions.

--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)aklaver(dot)com