| From: | Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Is this good spec for a PostgreSQL server? |
| Date: | 2007-09-19 12:59:36 |
| Message-ID: | 46F11D38.9070605@cox.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 09/19/07 07:33, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> Well, it isn't really the largest database or the database that
> need the most performance... At the moment, the database isn't
> larger than 15MB and is growing slowly... It is a webapp that is
That'll fit in shared memory. Very fast.
Where will it be in a year?
> using the database and at the most (at the moment) there is about
> 12-14 concurrent users and not much data volume...
How many users in a year?
> We are thinking about this spec. because the web app is a java
> app, and we need need something that can run java fast as well as
> postgresql...
12-14 users on a Quad-core system with 4GB RAM?
Am I so old that (even accepting Tomcat and Java) that seems
"excessive"?
- --
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson LA USA
Give a man a fish, and he eats for a day.
Hit him with a fish, and he goes away for good!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFG8R04S9HxQb37XmcRAhblAJ9AIS90c+xjOs4KOLqkYOg7gf2PwgCgleFw
gZ82nICVs6tEKVY7IxGD1Fs=
=xrCi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Patricia Rodriguez Tome | 2007-09-19 13:02:26 | a problem with pg_hba.conf |
| Previous Message | Phoenix Kiula | 2007-09-19 12:54:00 | Re: For index bloat: VACUUM ANALYZE vs REINDEX/CLUSTER |