From: | Bjørn T Johansen <btj(at)havleik(dot)no> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is this good spec for a PostgreSQL server? |
Date: | 2007-09-19 13:32:39 |
Message-ID: | 20070919153239.24a7c8ab@laptop-btj |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007 07:59:36 -0500
Ron Johnson <ron(dot)l(dot)johnson(at)cox(dot)net> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/19/07 07:33, Bjørn T Johansen wrote:
> > Well, it isn't really the largest database or the database that
> > need the most performance... At the moment, the database isn't
> > larger than 15MB and is growing slowly... It is a webapp that is
>
> That'll fit in shared memory. Very fast.
>
> Where will it be in a year?
Well, twice as much I guess...
>
> > using the database and at the most (at the moment) there is about
> > 12-14 concurrent users and not much data volume...
>
> How many users in a year?
It's an internal webapp for a company, so I guess not that much more...
>
> > We are thinking about this spec. because the web app is a java
> > app, and we need need something that can run java fast as well as
> > postgresql...
>
> 12-14 users on a Quad-core system with 4GB RAM?
>
> Am I so old that (even accepting Tomcat and Java) that seems
> "excessive"?
Yes, I think that it's a bit excessive but the company can afford it so why not... :)
BTJ
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ron Johnson | 2007-09-19 13:40:08 | Re: Is this good spec for a PostgreSQL server? |
Previous Message | Patricia Rodriguez Tome | 2007-09-19 13:10:55 | problemes pga_hba.conf |