From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Phoenix Kiula <phoenix(dot)kiula(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Postgres General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: For index bloat: VACUUM ANALYZE vs REINDEX/CLUSTER |
Date: | 2007-09-18 05:14:56 |
Message-ID: | 46EF5ED0.6020808@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Phoenix Kiula wrote:
> The manual is vague. Several threads about this, in language that is
> ambiguous to me.
>
> So a YES/NO question:
>
> Q: To get rid of index bloat, is a VACUUM ANALYZE enough? Or must I
> reindex/cluster indexes?
If you overrun your max_fsm_pages, no:
else yes;
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
>
> Thanks.
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG717QATb/zqfZUUQRAh6uAJ9CGXbA2BxXvMbSZP9Gv8gI9QBkXgCePhqe
6aS3fp60g7YrWECspTVcxyE=
=u2o/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ow Mun Heng | 2007-09-18 05:54:01 | Re: For index bloat: VACUUM ANALYZE vs REINDEX/CLUSTER |
Previous Message | Phoenix Kiula | 2007-09-18 05:00:31 | For index bloat: VACUUM ANALYZE vs REINDEX/CLUSTER |