Re: an other provokative question??

From: Ron Mayer <rm_pg(at)cheapcomplexdevices(dot)com>
To: Dann Corbit <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com>
Subject: Re: an other provokative question??
Date: 2007-09-06 20:29:36
Message-ID: 46E06330.4050903@cheapcomplexdevices.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Dann Corbit wrote:
> All of the database systems
> that I know of that use this column-oriented scheme are in-memory
> database systems. I don't know if Mr. Stonebraker's is also.

KDB+ (http://kx.com/) is column-oriented and has both on-disk
and in-memory capabilities http://kx.com/faq/#6 . It's around
since 1998 and both column and row oriented databases are still
around so I think it'd be more fair to say both are mature technologies.

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Marlowe 2007-09-06 21:02:47 Re: Postgresql 7.3 on Red Hat Enterprise 5 (Problem with SEMMNI, SEMMNS)
Previous Message Dann Corbit 2007-09-06 20:07:00 Re: an other provokative question??