From: | Pallav Kalva <pkalva(at)livedatagroup(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Mark Lewis <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? |
Date: | 2007-08-31 18:42:11 |
Message-ID: | 46D86103.6060204@livedatagroup.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
Mark Lewis wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 12:25 -0400, Pallav Kalva wrote:
>
>> Can you please correct me if I am wrong, I want to understand how this
>> works.
>> Based on what you said, it will run autovacuum again when it passes 200M
>> transactions, as SELECTS are transactions too and are going on these
>> tables.
>> But the next time when it runs autovacuum, it shouldnt freeze the tuples
>> again as they are already frozen and wont generate lot of archive logs ?
>> Or is this because of it ran autovacuum for the first time on this db ?
>> just the first time it does this process ?
>>
>
> That is correct. The tuples are now frozen, which means that they will
> not need to be frozen ever again unless you insert/update any records.
>
>
My main concern is filling up my disk with archive logs, so from all the
replies I get is that since tuples are already frozen, next time when it
runs autovacuum it wont generate any archive logs.
Is my assumption right ?
Thanks! everybody on all your replies. It's was very helpful.
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives?
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org
>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2007-08-31 18:47:44 | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? |
Previous Message | Mikko Partio | 2007-08-31 18:31:47 | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? |