| From: | Mark Lewis <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pallav Kalva <pkalva(at)livedatagroup(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? |
| Date: | 2007-08-31 16:29:31 |
| Message-ID: | 1188577771.22730.238.camel@archimedes |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Fri, 2007-08-31 at 12:25 -0400, Pallav Kalva wrote:
> Can you please correct me if I am wrong, I want to understand how this
> works.
> Based on what you said, it will run autovacuum again when it passes 200M
> transactions, as SELECTS are transactions too and are going on these
> tables.
> But the next time when it runs autovacuum, it shouldnt freeze the tuples
> again as they are already frozen and wont generate lot of archive logs ?
> Or is this because of it ran autovacuum for the first time on this db ?
> just the first time it does this process ?
That is correct. The tuples are now frozen, which means that they will
not need to be frozen ever again unless you insert/update any records.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Chris Browne | 2007-08-31 17:46:09 | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? |
| Previous Message | Pallav Kalva | 2007-08-31 16:25:16 | Re: 8.2 Autovacuum BUG ? |