| From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Date: | 2007-08-30 19:44:00 |
| Message-ID: | 46D71E00.2090804@commandprompt.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Let me ask a question, how many people who are against a name change now
> The bottom line is that the pronunciation/marketing problem with the
> name "PostgreSQL" is not going to change --- it is only going to get
> worse.
I am against the name change and I do not agree with your assessment. I
believe it will get better. As the only real problem is the initial
understanding and pronunciation. The rest is muscle memory.
Sincerely,
Joshua D. Drake
- --
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFG1x4AATb/zqfZUUQRAiAaAJsFuoXcsNtTfKeI39izYoGmrlNBMwCfY6D9
cBTJB1WtslvmV0sgF7KEfdI=
=WLlk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-30 19:52:58 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-08-30 19:38:34 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |