Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-30 19:38:34
Message-ID: 200708301938.l7UJcY326399@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Let me ask a question, how many people who are against a name change now
think we should have done it before we released 8.0? Because the same
arguments I hear now are the ones I heard then. There was a feeling
pre-8.0 that we were too entrenched to make a change, but in hindsight
we were not that entrenched, but now we are really entrenched. What I
think we will find in two years it that many will wish we had made the
change pre-8.3 because in two years we will be even more entrenched than
we are now.

The bottom line is that the pronunciation/marketing problem with the
name "PostgreSQL" is not going to change --- it is only going to get
worse.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-30 19:44:00 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Joshua D. Drake 2007-08-30 19:37:56 Re: PostgreSQL.Org (was: PostgreSQL Conference Fal l 2007)