Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Robert Bernier wrote:
> JD,
>
>> Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> Before anyone goes down this path too far it is very important that I
>>> disclose (as I have on multiple occasions before) that Command Prompt
>>> owns the name Postgres, Inc (and domains postgresinc.com/net/org)
>
>
> Would it possible for you to state your 'official' position on the various outcomes that this current debate could take?

Color me dense, but "what?", do you mean do I think the project should
change its name or not?

Joshua D. Drake

>
> Robert
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
> subscribe-nomail command to majordomo(at)postgresql(dot)org so that your
> message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
>

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
PostgreSQL solutions since 1997 http://www.commandprompt.com/
UNIQUE NOT NULL
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFG1HFuATb/zqfZUUQRAlgAAJ0X9MJcn+PcOpjm8uVxvhe6uucpZgCcCAC8
5N2baggyRuL/tdrYgf1DWV8=
=JFVp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----