Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)

From: Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Derek Rodner <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Date: 2007-08-28 18:52:03
Message-ID: 46D46ED3.6070001@janestcapital.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Magnus Hagander wrote:

>Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Before anyone goes down this path too far it is very important that I
>>disclose (as I have on multiple occasions before) that Command Prompt
>>owns the name Postgres, Inc (and domains postgresinc.com/net/org)
>>
>>Although we do not have intention to immediately change our name, I will
>>note that if the project changes its name, it increases the possibility
>>that we may do so.
>>
>>
>
>First, thanks for letting us know this before people get too settled on
>something :) At least those of us who missed it last time(s)...
>
>Second, this makes my own vote much easier: a clear -1 on the change
>(unless cmd would be donating that name+domains to the pg fund or
>something, but given that you didn't suggest that I don't expect that to
>happen)
>
>
>

I'm -1 as well, although I'm mainly a "those who have to do the work get
to decide if, when, and how the work gets done". I.e. that only the
project maintainers should get to vote.

Brian

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Derek Rodner 2007-08-28 18:52:22 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)
Previous Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-08-28 18:51:43 Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL)