From: | Brian Hurt <bhurt(at)janestcapital(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Derek Rodner <derek(dot)rodner(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Bernier <robert(dot)bernier5(at)sympatico(dot)ca>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Date: | 2007-08-28 18:52:03 |
Message-ID: | 46D46ED3.6070001@janestcapital.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Magnus Hagander wrote:
>Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>Before anyone goes down this path too far it is very important that I
>>disclose (as I have on multiple occasions before) that Command Prompt
>>owns the name Postgres, Inc (and domains postgresinc.com/net/org)
>>
>>Although we do not have intention to immediately change our name, I will
>>note that if the project changes its name, it increases the possibility
>>that we may do so.
>>
>>
>
>First, thanks for letting us know this before people get too settled on
>something :) At least those of us who missed it last time(s)...
>
>Second, this makes my own vote much easier: a clear -1 on the change
>(unless cmd would be donating that name+domains to the pg fund or
>something, but given that you didn't suggest that I don't expect that to
>happen)
>
>
>
I'm -1 as well, although I'm mainly a "those who have to do the work get
to decide if, when, and how the work gets done". I.e. that only the
project maintainers should get to vote.
Brian
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Derek Rodner | 2007-08-28 18:52:22 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |
Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2007-08-28 18:51:43 | Re: The naming question (Postgres vs PostgreSQL) |