Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling

On Jan 6, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Tom Lane wrote:

> I went with 5.8 as the cutoff, for a couple of reasons: we're not in
> the business of telling people they ought to be up-to-date, but only of
> rejecting versions that demonstrably fail badly; and I found out that
> older versions of awk are not sufficiently competent with && and || to
> code a more complex test properly :-(. A version check that doesn't
> actually do what it claims to is worse than useless, and old buggy awk
> is exactly what you'd expect to find on a box with old buggy perl.

Yes, but even a buggy old Perl is quite competent with && and ||. Why use awk to test the version of Perl when you have this other nice utility to do the job?

> (It's also worth noting that the perl version seen at configure time
> is not necessarily that seen at runtime, anyway, so there's not a lot
> of point in getting too finicky here.)

Fair enough.

Best,

David