| From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: unresolved bugs |
| Date: | 2010-01-07 06:40:54 |
| Message-ID: | 1262846454.14688.15.camel@vanquo.pezone.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On ons, 2010-01-06 at 16:44 -0800, Josh Berkus wrote:
> > Personally, I was more hoping we could consider fixing some of them...
>
> Agreed. I really don't think a bug tracker helps us. We need two things:
>
> (1) to respond to bug submissions immediately and fix them, and
> (2) if we can't fix the bugs immediately, to add them to a TODO list
>
> Adding stuff to a bug tracker is just a way to procrastinate on it
> indefinitely.
The problem is that your two-step plan requires failsafe human
intervention, whereas a bug tracker doesn't.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David E. Wheeler | 2010-01-07 07:37:15 | Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling |
| Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-01-07 06:19:29 | Re: 'replication' keyword on .pgpass (Streaming Replication) |