From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Brent Verner" <brent(at)rcfile(dot)org>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "Murray Prior Hobbs" <murray(at)efone(dot)com>, "Lamar Owen" <lamar(dot)owen(at)wgcr(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pltlc and pltlcu problems |
Date: | 2002-01-21 18:38:12 |
Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA41EB4BF@m0114.s-mxs.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> > Don't you all trust Makefile.shlib ?
>
> I do trust Makefile.shlib. I don't trust a large revision of the pltcl
> build process on the day we intend to put out RC1. That's a recipe for
> embarrassment.
Yes, I know, and do accept that :-) Just had to rid myself of a little
annoyance ... (probably wasn't good wording, but such is the krux of
non-native speakers)
> Did you already forget my report yesterday that your patch failed on HPUX?
I hoped, you would test on hpux, but yes. sorry. The only diff to my latest
patch that Bruce keeps in queue is the "-lc", no ?
> How many of our other platforms might have problems too? Minor ones,
> sure, but we have no remaining window for port testing.
Note for future fix:
I think actually hpux only failed, because it has a broken Makefile.shlib.
It is Makefile.shlib's business to know that the link line for
a shlib needs -lc ? Other ports that still use ld to link seem to get
this right (mainly the BSD's). (Makefile.port might also be the place
to do this)
As a short test you could test plpython on hpux with current cvs.
My guess is, that it doesn't work.
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Sam Cao | 2002-01-21 18:44:42 | Foreign Key? |
Previous Message | Vince Vielhaber | 2002-01-21 18:10:24 | Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Licence: GNU/GPL |