From: | "Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD" <ZeugswetterA(at)spardat(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY |
Date: | 2005-03-10 09:17:50 |
Message-ID: | 46C15C39FEB2C44BA555E356FBCD6FA40184D339@m0114.s-mxs.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
> What that means is that neither the HAVING clause nor the targetlist
> can use any ungrouped columns except within aggregate calls; that is,
>
> select col from tab having 2>1
Informix:
select tabname from systables having 2 > 1;
294: The column (tabname) must be in the GROUP BY list.
select tabname from systables group by 1 having 2 > 1;
all rows returned
select tabname from systables group by 1 having 1 > 2;
no rows found
Andreas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Henk van den Toorn | 2005-03-10 09:38:32 | BUG #1533: "*OLD*" relation not recognized in CREATE RULE |
Previous Message | cathy.hemsley | 2005-03-10 08:45:01 | Re: R: Fault when return strings over 256 characters in PLpgSQL |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Milen A. Radev | 2005-03-10 09:19:03 | Too frequent warnings for wraparound failure |
Previous Message | Gaetano Mendola | 2005-03-10 09:13:34 | Re: One vacuum full is not enough. |