| From: | Gaetano Mendola <gmendola(at)mbigroup(dot)it> |
|---|---|
| To: | Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)tm(dot)ee> |
| Cc: | Gaetano Mendola <mendola(at)bigfoot(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: One vacuum full is not enough. |
| Date: | 2005-03-10 09:13:34 |
| Message-ID: | 42300FBE.1010104@mbigroup.it |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hannu Krosing wrote:
> Ühel kenal päeval (teisipäev, 8. märts 2005, 00:52+0100), kirjutas
> Gaetano Mendola:
>
>>Hi all,
>>running a 7.4.5 it happen to me with another table
>>where a single vacuum full was not freeing enough pages,
>>here the verbose vacuum full, as you can see only at
>>the end: truncated 8504 to 621 pages.
>>
>>I use pg_autovacuum and it's not enough. I'll schedule
>>again a nightly vacuum full.
>
>
> You may have too few fsm pages, so new inserts/updates don't use all the pages freed by vacuums.
>
Is not this the case:
max_fsm_pages | 2000000
max_fsm_relations | 1000
and when I was doing the vacuum full these settings were above the
real needs.
Regards
Gaetano Mendola
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCMA++7UpzwH2SGd4RAi0hAJwLBpSWlDTQoAWglK8Dg/IoY3fb8QCfTjKU
wxDSc2VG7B5pRPfCfQqxRtk=
=Ce+9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Zeugswetter Andreas DAZ SD | 2005-03-10 09:17:50 | Re: [HACKERS] We are not following the spec for HAVING without GROUP BY |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2005-03-10 07:39:38 | Re: NIST Test Suite |