Re: crypting prosrc in pg_proc

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Andrew Sullivan <ajs(at)crankycanuck(dot)ca>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: crypting prosrc in pg_proc
Date: 2007-08-09 15:30:28
Message-ID: 46BB3314.6060102@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:42:19PM +0200, Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote:
>
>> the problem here is that vendors of appliances don't want people to
>> spider their codes. this is a fact - it is not the idea of open
>> source to do so but bloody reality. in addition to that people are
>> not willing to code everything in C just to hide.
>
> Well, then, they're out of luck.

This whole thread can be summed up as: plpgsql is an interpretive
language, not a compiled on.

You can and do see the source, just like perl, ruby, python, bash etc...

If you don't like it, don't use it and use C instead.

:)

Keep in mind that the obfuscation techniques that can be used by python
and perl are all reversible.

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake

- --

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGuzMUATb/zqfZUUQRAn0uAJ9evWtJkzS5hMiJDNSi+1jxMobdoACghm3D
r7Tmmz801bKntXAipJBrvy4=
=yRz/
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-08-09 15:41:02 Re: crypting prosrc in pg_proc
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-08-09 15:29:24 Re: crypting prosrc in pg_proc