From: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: crypting prosrc in pg_proc |
Date: | 2007-08-09 22:25:32 |
Message-ID: | 200708091825.32878.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thursday 09 August 2007 11:30, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> Andrew Sullivan wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 04:42:19PM +0200, Hans-Juergen Schoenig wrote:
> >> the problem here is that vendors of appliances don't want people to
> >> spider their codes. this is a fact - it is not the idea of open
> >> source to do so but bloody reality. in addition to that people are
> >> not willing to code everything in C just to hide.
> >
> > Well, then, they're out of luck.
>
> This whole thread can be summed up as: plpgsql is an interpretive
> language, not a compiled on.
>
> You can and do see the source, just like perl, ruby, python, bash etc...
>
> If you don't like it, don't use it and use C instead.
>
> :)
>
> Keep in mind that the obfuscation techniques that can be used by python
> and perl are all reversible.
>
Hmm.... I wonder if you could wire plphp through something like Zend Gaurd?
--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-09 22:32:51 | Re: Compilation of pg 7.4.17 fails on HP-UX |
Previous Message | Jason Nerothin | 2007-08-09 21:34:58 | 2D partitioning of VLDB - sane or not? |