Re: Performance problems with large telemetric datasets on 7.4.2

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Sven Clement <sven(at)dsign(dot)lu>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Kroeger <andrew(at)sprocks(dot)gotdns(dot)com>, Mark Lewis <mark(dot)lewis(at)mir3(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Performance problems with large telemetric datasets on 7.4.2
Date: 2007-08-05 16:07:35
Message-ID: 46B5F5C7.1070901@enterprisedb.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Sven Clement wrote:
> OK so beginning on Monday I will test the config on a 8.2.x to verify the
> performance issues, but I also found some disturbing info's on the net, that
> the index may be corrupted because of the big difference between an index
> entry which is deleted and the new value inserted afterwards, which should
> not be an issue with a btree, but do you guys know something more about it,
> sorry I'm really good in SQL but in Postgre I'm still a beginner.

I don't remember a bug like that. Where did you read that from?

--
Heikki Linnakangas
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Merlin Moncure 2007-08-06 01:56:35 Re: Default Performance between 8.0 and 8.1
Previous Message Adriaan van Os 2007-08-04 21:39:31 Re: TRUNCATE TABLE