From: | Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Date: | 2007-08-04 18:17:33 |
Message-ID: | 46B4C2BD.7080100@pooteeweet.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Dave Page wrote:
>
>> ------- Original Message -------
>> From: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
>> To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
>> Sent: 04/08/07, 19:04:34
>> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
>>
>> Oh maybe I missed something here, but I did not realize that we are
>> discussing replacing the main site with a wiki. I just think that the
>> wiki is perfect when we want to involve a broad audience in the creation
>> of the text (which may very well then we moved to techdoc or the
>> documentation later on) or when its just for a quick one shot with a
>> life time if a few weeks (months tops).
>
> I fully support the use of a wiki for that (a good example is Greg Smith's recent pg/my comparison). I *do not* support the use of a wiki for final publication of anything aimed at end users.
>
> I also have no issue experimenting with permissions to help Josh and the advocacy guys, but I don't think another wiki is required.
+1
regards,
Lukas
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2007-08-04 18:17:59 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2007-08-04 18:15:37 | Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki |