From: | "Dave Page" <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | "Lukas Kahwe Smith" <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org> |
Cc: | "Magnus Hagander" <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Date: | 2007-08-04 18:15:37 |
Message-ID: | 200708041915370000@2024314099 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
> ------- Original Message -------
> From: Lukas Kahwe Smith <smith(at)pooteeweet(dot)org>
> To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
> Sent: 04/08/07, 19:04:34
> Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
>
> Oh maybe I missed something here, but I did not realize that we are
> discussing replacing the main site with a wiki. I just think that the
> wiki is perfect when we want to involve a broad audience in the creation
> of the text (which may very well then we moved to techdoc or the
> documentation later on) or when its just for a quick one shot with a
> life time if a few weeks (months tops).
I fully support the use of a wiki for that (a good example is Greg Smith's recent pg/my comparison). I *do not* support the use of a wiki for final publication of anything aimed at end users.
I also have no issue experimenting with permissions to help Josh and the advocacy guys, but I don't think another wiki is required.
/D
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2007-08-04 18:17:33 | Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki |
Previous Message | Lukas Kahwe Smith | 2007-08-04 18:04:34 | Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki |