| From: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Decibel!" <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
| Date: | 2007-08-04 17:39:20 |
| Message-ID: | 46B4B9C8.1090200@hagander.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www |
Decibel! wrote:
>> As long as that holds, I'm absolutely up for giving it a try. Maybe part
>> of the disagreement has been from a misunderstanding of what a "public
>> wiki" is. In my book, a *public* wiki is one that doesn't need a
>> verified account. (I assume that you refer to verified account above. If
>> not, I don't agree until you add the word verified)
>
> Well, at the bare minimum we need a captcha or something similar.
> Without that then yes, we're going to get all kinds of crap accounts.
> Do we just have that turned off, or does mediawiki actually not support
> that?
I'd say we want email verification, so that we can contact the authors
when needed.
That said, I have no clue about mediawiki ;-)
//Magnus
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2007-08-04 17:47:17 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
| Previous Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-04 17:28:33 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Treat | 2007-08-04 17:47:17 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |
| Previous Message | Decibel! | 2007-08-04 17:28:33 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki |