Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

From: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki
Date: 2007-08-04 17:47:17
Message-ID: 200708041347.18283.xzilla@users.sourceforge.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-www

On Saturday 04 August 2007 11:15, Dave Page wrote:
> Robert Treat wrote:
> > On Saturday 04 August 2007 09:56, Greg Sabino Mullane wrote:
> >> but opening it up to anyone is
> >> generally a bad idea unless, like Wikipedia, you a) are willing to put
> >> up with vandalism and general subtle mischief and b) have the critical
> >> mass of watchers to keep (a) to a minimum. The experience of the
> >> interactive docs indicate that we do not have that mass yet,
> >
> > What experience is this?
>
> I imagine he's referring to the mountain of garbage that used to build
> up until Magnus and I had a monster session moderating a few thousand
> comments to get them back under control.
>

*sigh*

Doesn't this suggest we do have mass to prevent vandalism/mischief ?

--
Robert Treat
Build A Brighter LAMP :: Linux Apache {middleware} PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Kahwe Smith 2007-08-04 17:49:03 Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-08-04 17:39:20 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki

Browse pgsql-www by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lukas Kahwe Smith 2007-08-04 17:49:03 Re: [pgsql-www] We need an Advocacy wiki
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2007-08-04 17:39:20 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] We need an Advocacy wiki