Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark

From: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark
Date: 2007-07-11 18:34:13
Message-ID: 469522A5.1070409@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Can you list others that seemed out of place?

Thanks.
Regards,
Jignesh

Tom Lane wrote:
> "Jignesh K. Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
>
>> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>>
>>> May I ask you why you set max_prepared_transactions to 450, while
>>> you're apparently not using prepared transactions, according to this
>>> quote:
>>>
>
>
>> Yep.. one of the things that we didn't revert back and got strayed out
>> there.
>>
>
> There were quite a few settings in that list that looked like random
> experimentation rather than recommendable good practice to me.
>
> regards, tom lane
>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2007-07-11 18:35:50 Re: best use of an EMC SAN
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-07-11 18:27:01 Re: best use of an EMC SAN