Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jignesh K(dot) Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM>
Cc: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL publishes first real benchmark
Date: 2007-07-11 17:07:19
Message-ID: 27436.1184173639@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

"Jignesh K. Shah" <J(dot)K(dot)Shah(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> May I ask you why you set max_prepared_transactions to 450, while
>> you're apparently not using prepared transactions, according to this
>> quote:

> Yep.. one of the things that we didn't revert back and got strayed out
> there.

There were quite a few settings in that list that looked like random
experimentation rather than recommendable good practice to me.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Browne 2007-07-11 17:39:39 Re: best use of an EMC SAN
Previous Message Andrew Sullivan 2007-07-11 17:01:57 Re: TIMING A QUERY ???