Re: Worries about delayed-commit semantics

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Worries about delayed-commit semantics
Date: 2007-06-22 14:33:48
Message-ID: 467BDDCC.6020101@dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>
> I like "synchronous_commit = off", it even has a little girlfriend
> getting spin while being accurate :)
>

In my experience, *_commit = off rarely gets you a girlfriend ...

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-06-22 14:34:34 Re: tsearch in core patch
Previous Message PFC 2007-06-22 14:33:45 Re: Worries about delayed-commit semantics