From: | Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New cast between inet/cidr and bytea |
Date: | 2007-05-31 05:31:48 |
Message-ID: | 465E5DC4.9050501@cybertec.at |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian írta:
> Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> we at Cybertec have developed cast functions in C between
>> inet/cidr <-> bytea for a client and we would like to submit it.
>>
>> This is how it works:
>> - IPv4 inet/cidr value will return 4 bytes if the netmask covers all 32
>> bits.
>> It returns 5 bytes if the netmask is shorter than 32 bits.
>> - Similarly for IPv6, 12[+1] bytes is returned.
>> - 4, 5, 12 or 13 bytes long bytea values are converted
>> to an inet/cidr value, the 5th or 13th byte is range-checked
>> to be a valid netmask value.
>>
>> What are the requirements for it to be accepted
>> as a core cast function or as a contrib module?
>>
>
> You discuss it on the hackers list.
That's what I am trying to.
> Have you read the developer's FAQ?
>
Not yet in its entireness.
> What is the use case for such a cast?
>
e.g.:
# select '192.168.0.1'::inet::bytea;
bytea
------------------
\300\250\000\001
(1 row)
# select '192.168.0.0/24'::inet::bytea;
bytea
----------------------
\300\250\000\000\030
(1 row)
# select decode('\\300\\250\\000\\001', 'escape')::inet;
decode
-------------
192.168.0.1
(1 row)
# select decode('\\300\\250\\000\\000\\030', 'escape')::inet;
decode
----------------
192.168.0.2/24
(1 row)
Similarly for IPv6 addresses.
The application doesn't want to parse the textual IP address
when all the parsing and checking intelligence is already there
in the inet/cidr type checks. The reverse when you pass in bytes
is only a logical extension.
--
----------------------------------
Zoltán Böszörményi
Cybertec Geschwinde & Schönig GmbH
http://www.postgresql.at/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Zoltan Boszormenyi | 2007-05-31 05:50:15 | Re: New cast between inet/cidr and bytea |
Previous Message | Jon Colverson | 2007-05-31 04:58:26 | Re: Attempt to re-archive existing WAL logs after restoring from backup |