From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Zoltan Boszormenyi <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: New cast between inet/cidr and bytea |
Date: | 2007-05-30 19:01:57 |
Message-ID: | 200705301901.l4UJ1vA24431@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Zoltan Boszormenyi wrote:
> Hi,
>
> we at Cybertec have developed cast functions in C between
> inet/cidr <-> bytea for a client and we would like to submit it.
>
> This is how it works:
> - IPv4 inet/cidr value will return 4 bytes if the netmask covers all 32
> bits.
> It returns 5 bytes if the netmask is shorter than 32 bits.
> - Similarly for IPv6, 12[+1] bytes is returned.
> - 4, 5, 12 or 13 bytes long bytea values are converted
> to an inet/cidr value, the 5th or 13th byte is range-checked
> to be a valid netmask value.
>
> What are the requirements for it to be accepted
> as a core cast function or as a contrib module?
You discuss it on the hackers list. Have you read the developer's FAQ?
What is the use case for such a cast?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2007-05-30 19:02:55 | Re: Changing checkpoint_timeout to another name? |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-05-30 18:54:14 | Re: Changing checkpoint_timeout to another name? |