Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support

From: Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support
Date: 2007-04-16 16:12:52
Message-ID: 4623A084.1080705@sun.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Tom Lane wrote:
> Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
>> If we expose LET_OS_MANAGE_FILESIZE, should we add a flag to the
>> control file so that you can't start a backend that has that defined
>> against a cluster that was initialized without it?
>
> I imagine we'd flag that as relsegsize = 0 or some such.

Yes I have it in my patch. I put relsegsize = 0 in the control file when
non-segmentation mode is enabled.

Zdenek

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2007-04-16 17:17:45 Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: [PATCHES] Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch
Previous Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-04-16 15:53:07 Re: What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zoltan Boszormenyi 2007-04-16 17:17:45 Re: IDENTITY/GENERATED v36 Re: [PATCHES] Final version of IDENTITY/GENERATED patch
Previous Message Kris Jurka 2007-04-16 08:04:54 Remove warning about const qualifier