Re: What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?

From: "Florian G(dot) Pflug" <fgp(at)phlo(dot)org>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Alexey Klyukin <alexk(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: What tools do people use to hack on PostgreSQL?
Date: 2007-04-16 15:53:07
Message-ID: 46239BE3.7040801@phlo.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Joshua D. Drake wrote:
>>> http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/pgsql/browser
>>>
>>> or do the anonymous checkout with:
>>>
>>> svn co http://projects.commandprompt.com/public/pgsql/repo/
>>
>> But if you have a checked out tree, does it work to do an update after
>> the tree has been regenerated? As far as I know, the repo is generated
>> completely every few hours, so it wouldn't surprise me that the checked
>> out copy is not compatible with the new repo.
>>
>> I admit I haven't tried.
>
> Not a clue. Anyone try it yet?

git-svn seems to work fine against the SVN repo, apart from the problem with
the files deleted in CVS which still show up in SVN.

It's only running for about two days though...

greetings, Florian Pflug

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zdenek Kotala 2007-04-16 16:12:52 Re: [PATCHES] Fix for large file support
Previous Message Florian G. Pflug 2007-04-16 15:49:37 Re: Build-Problem with pgc.c on OSX 10.4