From: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |
Date: | 2007-04-11 13:09:37 |
Message-ID: | 461CDE11.4060002@postgresql.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I thought we had things set up so that there were multiple people
>>> moderating the postgres mail lists, but it seems like the average time
>>> to approve postings from unsubscribed folk has slid back down to the
>>> two-or-three-day range :-(. What can be done to improve that? Maybe
>>> recruit a few more moderators?
>> Which lists are slow? I tend to moderate in real time whilst I'm awake,
>> or at least the next time I check my mail when not (which is invariably
>> only a few hours away). I can probably add another couple to my list if
>> that would help.
>
> What do people use to moderate? Are there any scripts to help or
> something? I've seen people wasting time hitting reply, writing
> "accept", etc, which consumes a lot of time.
That's what I do - it takes a couple of seconds each for the dozen or so
approvals I do on 6 or so of our lists per day.
Regards, Dave.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Sullivan | 2007-04-11 13:28:40 | Re: Very slow rsync of ftp site |
Previous Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2007-04-11 13:07:55 | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |