From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |
Date: | 2007-04-11 13:03:40 |
Message-ID: | 20070411130340.GB4896@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
> > I thought we had things set up so that there were multiple people
> > moderating the postgres mail lists, but it seems like the average time
> > to approve postings from unsubscribed folk has slid back down to the
> > two-or-three-day range :-(. What can be done to improve that? Maybe
> > recruit a few more moderators?
>
> Which lists are slow? I tend to moderate in real time whilst I'm awake,
> or at least the next time I check my mail when not (which is invariably
> only a few hours away). I can probably add another couple to my list if
> that would help.
What do people use to moderate? Are there any scripts to help or
something? I've seen people wasting time hitting reply, writing
"accept", etc, which consumes a lot of time. (FWIW I do have a script,
which currently only works for pgsql-es-ayuda but I think it could be
easily generalized).
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Sabino Mullane | 2007-04-11 13:07:55 | Re: [whine] Slow moderation on postgres lists |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2007-04-11 11:34:05 | Re: FYI - new wwwmaster |