Re: Documentation access problems.

From: "Matthew T(dot) O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Hugh Sasse <hgs(at)dmu(dot)ac(dot)uk>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Documentation access problems.
Date: 2007-03-23 19:56:59
Message-ID: 4604310B.60305@zeut.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> "Matthew T. O'Connor" <matthew(at)zeut(dot)net> writes:
>>> Lots of projects publish their HTML docs in two formats: One Big HTML
>>> file with everything; Broken up into many HTML files that link to each
>>> other. This would allow you you have one big searchable document.
>> The key word there being "big" ;-) ... I don't have any problem with
>> making such a version available on the website, but I don't think
>> shipping two versions of the HTML docs in our tarballs is reasonable.
>
> I think having the single HTML file version available on our web site is
> enough.

Agreed.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-03-23 20:56:40 pgsql: We no longer need to palloc the VacuumStmt node; keeping it on
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-03-23 19:33:56 Re: Documentation access problems.