pgsql: We no longer need to palloc the VacuumStmt node; keeping it on

From: alvherre(at)postgresql(dot)org (Alvaro Herrera)
To: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: pgsql: We no longer need to palloc the VacuumStmt node; keeping it on
Date: 2007-03-23 20:56:40
Message-ID: 20070323205640.0C01A9FB6B7@postgresql.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Log Message:
-----------
We no longer need to palloc the VacuumStmt node; keeping it on the stack is
simpler.

Modified Files:
--------------
pgsql/src/backend/postmaster:
autovacuum.c (r1.34 -> r1.35)
(http://developer.postgresql.org/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c.diff?r1=1.34&r2=1.35)

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message User Dpage 2007-03-23 21:19:07 stackbuilder - wizard: Download using a sensible chunk size - 4Kb seems
Previous Message Tom Lane 2007-03-23 20:24:41 pgsql: Adjust DatumGetBool macro so that it isn't fooled by garbage in

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2007-03-23 21:22:22 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: We no longer need to palloc the VacuumStmt node; keeping it on
Previous Message Matthew T. O'Connor 2007-03-23 19:56:59 Re: Documentation access problems.