Re: real multi-master replication?

From: Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch>
To: Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com>
Cc: hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: real multi-master replication?
Date: 2007-03-07 12:23:09
Message-ID: 45EEAEAD.9000201@bluegap.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Hi,

Devrim GÜNDÜZ wrote:
>> Yes, AFAIK, their solution is two phase commit based, like Sequoia.
>
> I thought it was PGCluster. At least this is what I understood from the
> drawings.

Uhm, you're right, it looks very similar to PgCluster, not Sequoia. So
it's not two phase commit based, right?

Regards

Markus

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Markus Schulz 2007-03-07 13:31:11 Re: pg_dump and restore problem with function as DEFAULT-Constraint
Previous Message Richard Huxton 2007-03-07 12:01:17 Re: postgres slower on nested queries