| From: | Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)CommandPrompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Markus Schiltknecht <markus(at)bluegap(dot)ch> |
| Cc: | hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)gmail(dot)com>, Richard Broersma Jr <rabroersma(at)yahoo(dot)com>, Steve Atkins <steve(at)blighty(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: real multi-master replication? |
| Date: | 2007-03-07 11:50:40 |
| Message-ID: | 1173268240.3329.1197.camel@laptop.gunduz.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Hi,
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 12:14 +0100, Markus Schiltknecht wrote:
> hubert depesz lubaczewski wrote:
> > i contacted the company some time ago, and the information i got was
> > that their product is based on query-replication.
>
> Yes, AFAIK, their solution is two phase commit based, like Sequoia.
I thought it was PGCluster. At least this is what I understood from the
drawings.
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
Managed Services, Shared and Dedicated Hosting
Co-Authors: plPHP, ODBCng - http://www.commandprompt.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Martijn van Oosterhout | 2007-03-07 11:56:30 | Re: postgres slower on nested queries |
| Previous Message | Timasmith | 2007-03-07 11:46:53 | which is more scalable for the database? |