From: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | gabriel(dot)biberian(at)beemotechnologie(dot)com |
Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes) |
Date: | 2007-02-22 18:42:39 |
Message-ID: | 45DDE41F.6090907@commandprompt.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
n i tried adding an index to the table on the column date (int) that
> stores unix timestamps.
> TOTO=# CREATE INDEX versions_index ON versions_9d (date);
> (-60M) disk space goes down on index creation
> beebox(at)evobrik01:~$ time psql TOTO -c "UPDATE versions_9d SET flag=9"
> UPDATE 976009
> real 3m8.219s (+328M)
> beebox(at)evobrik01:~$ time psql TOTO -c "UPDATE versions_9d SET flag=8"
> UPDATE 976009
> real 6m24.716s (+326M)
> beebox(at)evobrik01:~$ time psql TOTO -c "UPDATE versions_9d SET flag=10"
> UPDATE 976009
> real 8m25.274s (+321M)
>
> As a sanity check, i loaded mysql5 and tried the same database and
> updates. With mysql, the update always lasts ~8s.
Yes but with mysql did you use myisam or innodb?
> The conclusions I have come to is that update==insert+delete which seems
> very heavy when index are present (and heavy disk wise on big tables).
> Is there a switch i can flip to optimise this?
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Gabriel Biberian
>
> ---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 7: You can help support the PostgreSQL project by donating at
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
>
--
=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Barbara Cosentino | 2007-02-22 20:19:50 | Vacuum full very slow due to nonremovable dead rows...What makes the dead rows non-removable? |
Previous Message | Steinar H. Gunderson | 2007-02-22 18:25:00 | Re: slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes) |