From: | "Steinar H(dot) Gunderson" <sgunderson(at)bigfoot(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes) |
Date: | 2007-02-22 18:25:00 |
Message-ID: | 20070222182500.GA32361@uio.no |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 07:11:42PM +0100, Gabriel Biberian wrote:
> Create a new DB and load a dump of the above database with 976009 rows,
> then i perform updates on the whole table. I recorded the time taken
> for each full update and the amount of extra disk space used. Each
> consecutive update of the table is slower than the previous
> beebox(at)evobrik01:~$ time psql TOTO -c "UPDATE versions_9d SET flag=2"
> UPDATE 976009
> real 0m41.542s
You're creating a huge amount of dead rows by this kind of procedure. Try a
VACUUM in-between, or enable autovacuum. (Adjusting your WAL and
checkpointing settings might help too.)
Apart from that, do you really have a scenario that requires updating _all_
rows in your table regularly?
/* Steinar */
--
Homepage: http://www.sesse.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2007-02-22 18:42:39 | Re: slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes) |
Previous Message | Gabriel Biberian | 2007-02-22 18:11:42 | slow update on 1M rows (worse with indexes) |