Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
>>> Somehow this seems like implementing RAID within postgres,
>> RAID and LVM too. I can't get excited about re-inventing those
>> wheels when perfectly good implementations already exist for us to
>> sit on top of.
>
> I expect that someone will point out that Windows doesn't support RAID
> or LVM, and we'll have to reimplement it anyway.
Windows supports both RAID and LVM.
//Magnus