Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Dimitri Fontaine <dim(at)dalibo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes
Date: 2007-02-19 18:34:55
Message-ID: 200702191934.56521.peter_e@gmx.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org> writes:
> > Somehow this seems like implementing RAID within postgres,
>
> RAID and LVM too. I can't get excited about re-inventing those
> wheels when perfectly good implementations already exist for us to
> sit on top of.

I expect that someone will point out that Windows doesn't support RAID
or LVM, and we'll have to reimplement it anyway.

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stefan Kaltenbrunner 2007-02-19 18:39:21 Re: Multiple Storage per Tablespace, or Volumes
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2007-02-19 18:34:17 Re: Short varlena headers and arrays