Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base

From: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
Subject: Re: Missing directory when building 8.2.3-base
Date: 2007-02-13 01:16:36
Message-ID: 45D11174.7090100@commandprompt.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> Jeroen T. Vermeulen wrote:
>> Is this a known problem? Is there any test procedure that builds the
>> "base" distribution before release?
>
> Most of the core team is convinced that the postgresql-foo tarballs are
> useless, but Marc insists on keeping them. But since they are nearly
> useless, no one tests them, so it is not surprising that they don't
> work.

Why do we keep them again? I can't recall at any point in the life of
CMD us ever using the -foo tarballs. Not to mention they just take up space.

Let's dump them.

Joshua D. Drake

--

=== The PostgreSQL Company: Command Prompt, Inc. ===
Sales/Support: +1.503.667.4564 || 24x7/Emergency: +1.800.492.2240
Providing the most comprehensive PostgreSQL solutions since 1997
http://www.commandprompt.com/

Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
PostgreSQL Replication: http://www.commandprompt.com/products/

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hideyuki Kawashima 2007-02-13 01:18:18 Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2007-02-13 01:15:49 Re: Acclerating INSERT/UPDATE using UPS